Thursday, 6 September 2018

I see dead people.

It had to be said, as lie detector tests go, Tony's was a bit shit

Evening all.

Time for a little Bennett-debunking, I think.

The Cadaverous Tramp has been energetically telling lies about Mrs Pamela Fenn, who is unable to defend herself on account of being dead.

So there are only two choices - either get Sabre-toothed Gurney to contact her from beyond the grave via the magic of some shitty crystal she purchased from QVC, or point out to Baldylocks that he's a big old liar.

Yeah, let's go for Plan B

The owner of the world's widest parting starts in typical fashion - with a statement indicating he has already made your mind up for you. Twat.  

1. On her own admission, she did not report the crying incident to the police at the time, or later
You think people go running to the police every time they hear a child crying? Get a life. And she did report it later, that's why it is in her statement. Stop me if I'm going too fast for your calcified neurons 

2. She appears to have been prompted into making her statement by the McCann Team
Absolute bullshit. No indication whatsoever that this is the case 


3. Mrs Fenn’s account of a burglary at her home in the weeks before 28th April is at the very least open to doubt. If she was not truthful about that, we simply cannot use her statement as evidence of anything.
Why is it open to doubt? Because you say so? Load of bollocks, no reason for her to make it up 

4Despite a child allegedly continually crying and sobbing for 75 minutes, with other properties all around, not one other person has ever corroborated the ‘crying incident’. No-one else heard it.
So what? Noise does not travel equally in all directions. She was in the flat above, and heard. You could have had a farting elephant in the room and people across the road might not have heard it, what with windows and shutters and no direct contact. Dozy pillock. 

5. Mrs Fenn says that she ’phoned and spoke to a Mrs Edna Glyn ‘some time after 11.00pm’, that is, after the crying had been going on for over half-an-hour. We have never seen any corroboration of this from Mrs Glyn
So fucking what? Why would we expect to see anything of the kind? You think an elderly lady is going to go public just in case some follicularly-challenged wanktrumpet can have his deranged mind put at rest 11 years later? 

6. It is claimed by Mrs Fenn that when she spoke to Mrs Glyn, she replied: ‘I am not surprised’. According to Mrs Fenn’s evidence, the child she heard crying was sobbing continually - and so must have been audible to her and Mrs Glyn as they were talking (if they were). Yet on Mrs Fenn’s evidence, neither of them bothered to lift a finger about it. They could have called the police or the Ocean Club. But they did nothing 
Absolute bullshit. She was on the phone to Mrs Glynn - Maddie would have had to be screaming her lungs out for her to have heard. And why SHOULD they do anything? It wasn't their responsibility, there was no suggestion the child was anything other than distressed. If someone is making that much noise, they are generally okay (First Aid 101)

7. In any event, Mrs Fenn’s account of contacting Mrs Glyn about the crying appears to conflict with the account of a police officer, who testified that Robert Murat had said that ‘some foreign woman’ had ’phoned him up on the night of the ‘crying incident’
Okay - we are now entering "You are a lying shit" territory. The policeman did no such thing. He testified that at some point Murat had phoned the post to let them know that some WOMEN, who were foreigners, could hear a child crying

There was NO suggestion it was on the night in question, quite the opposite.

He did not say 'woman', he said ''women''

Robert Murat was contacted by some women, who had already spoken to the police, to say they could hear a child crying. Correct thing to do. He contacted the police. Correct thing to do.

Stop fucking lying about it, you oily tit.

8. The description Mrs Fenn gives about the age of the child that she says she heard crying is strange, clumsy and contrived. Allowing for the possibility that something may have been ‘lost in translation’, her statement says that the crying was coming from directly below her and that “the tone of the crying seemed to be a young child and not a baby of two years of age or younger”. The twins were two years and two months during the holiday in Praia da Luz. Thus Pamela Fenn’s statement appears to rule them out. There is at least a suspicion therefore that her statement has been carefully crafted to suggest that it was Madeleine that was crying   
More bullshit. There is nothing clumsy or contrived about it. She stated that the child was using words, not just wailing. That suggests the older child. Cock. 
9. A news clip about Mrs Fenn appeared on SIC TV, Portugal, on 22 August two days after her statement at Portimao Police Station. In it, she denied having any information about the case:
Outright lie.
She very clearly denied having spoken to any journalists. She did NOT deny having information about the case, you just made that up. Wankstain.

Angry at the journalists' questions, Mrs Fenn denied being a witness in the case and said that what the press were saying was ‘pure speculation’.
Another lie. She did not deny being a witness or say that they were speculating.

Why do you do this, Bennett? These are easily provable lies, you dozy pissflange. 

10. Mrs Fenn herself was interviewed for the programme and said that anything she was supposed to have said to the police was ‘rubbish’.

No she fucking didn't. She said that she had not spoken to any journalists and what had been printed was rubbish.

What is worse is you then attach the following transcript, which has errors but which even so does not even back up your own claims in point 10!
Honestly, I have... I know nothing. I have been here three months. [She means: ‘This happened three months ago’. Mrs Fenn had lived I Praia da Luz for years]  Until all this happened, I've never spoken to a journalist, they've written rubbish in the newspapers. I've never even uttered a word! I've never (sighing)... it's all rubbish! Please, please, just forget it”. ]
She actually says 

"Honestly, I have... I know nothing. I have been here three months since all this happened, I have never spoken to a journalist, they've written rubbish in the newspapers, I've never even uttered a word. It's all rubbish, just please, please, forget it" 

So you weren't that far off - but even with the transcript, you have claimed something different

Don't be a knobend all your life, Tony. Take a day off.

Tuesday, 28 August 2018

Oh yes, he's the Great Researcher

Evening all

Well, it would seem that the man with a wider parting than Katie Price's knees has found someone to whom he wishes to donate the remaining scraps of his pension.


So let's see........

It wasn't a dummy company

It wasn't a sole trader, it was a limited company.

There is no indication that it was set up by Brian Kennedy and he was never a director

It would appear to have traded as it filed both accounts and an annual return.

It did not close after a few month, it was voluntarily struck off the register of companies after two and a half years.

As for what any member of the McCann team said, that is by the by.

Other than that, spot on! Well done!

Now - would you like to pay by Direct Debit?

PS - one bit of good news. You are being awarded a bonus point as you did at least on this occasion stalk the correct Mr Cowley. So it's not all bad. 

Friday, 20 July 2018

Masters of Disguise

(Copied over from My NotTextusa blog)

Seriously, guys?

"The most shocking sentence in the book concerned Kate's feelings toward Snr. Amaral so when I googled the name and discovered The Truth of the Lie, things fell into place. madeleine is clearly written as a reply, and it explained the tone of constant self justification.

The contrast between the two books became a reason to seek the truth, whatever it might be. I have watched all the "True Story of Madeleine McCann" videos of Richard D. Hall and many others on YouTube. I've visited a number of blogs where allegiances are easy to divine. As perhaps the most informative, I joined this forum to learn more. Thanks to the efforts of others concerned as I now am about this sad case, for the many questions I've asked myself after reading Kate's book there seems to be an answer. Even for apparently inconsequential things as pink trainers, and a dog attack.

I have since reread madeleine, and with the benefit of additional information, each page is a revelation.

I'm still reading, still learning, and wanted to say Thank You to the founders of the site for this invaluable resource and to its many knowledgeable contributors. Certainly I have not found The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™️ a "cesspit" as consistently labelled by one prominent blogger. Every thread I've read contains reasoned opinions, and views expressed without abuse. I think any fairminded person can see which purported theories hold water."
Honestly, how are you not permanently cringing in embarrassment, Tony? This is the least convincing disguise since Margaret Thatcher pretended to be a human

However, you have convinced Verdi, who normally sneers at any newcomer

"Excellent first post Jonal and thank you for those kind words which I know will be appreciated by al!

A big welcome to you on behalf of admin and members of CMoMM - looking forward to your further contribution."

Monday, 25 June 2018


I am crying with laughter

Behave, Bennett. 

There is no such evidence, just your fairy stories. The satellite image you posted for 3rd May 2007 CLEARLY SHOWS that PdL was sitting under a clear, cloudless sky.

May I suggest you familiarise yourself with the location of PdL and stop making a tit of yourself?

Or, as I suggest is more likely,  that you stop trying to con people.

And if you seriously think that your little poll of deranged Oompa loompas is going to convince anyone, then I suggest you try hitting yourself with a hammer in the hope that you might knock some sense into your calcified brain.

Monday, 18 June 2018


The sidebar at CMOMM states the following:

After forensic analysis of the 'Last Photo' there is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on the Thursday 3rd May, but most likely on the Sunday 29th April. So, where was Madeleine at lunchtime on Thursday?

This is complete bollocks

There is no forensic analysis of the ''last photo'' with respect to the time or date it was taken.

I would like Bennett to justify this false claim and also respond to my other posts where I have shown quite clearly, using images HE posted, that there was no cloud cover over PdL at the time this photo was reportedly taken

Thursday, 14 June 2018

Get yourself to Specsavers, you festering loon

The state of this

No they're not, you blind buffoon. You are a fucking idiot 

Okay, as no doubt you will argue the toss about it, in the airport video Madeleine is wearing crop trousers which are also a completely different colour to the full length ones she is wearing in the play area.

Gerry is wearing blue jeans on the bus and khaki shorts in the play area

You are a totally fucking useless researcher

From the man who spent months stalking the wrong  Martin Smith