Bennett wasn't used to the peasants revolting |
Right - where were we?
Oh yes.
Phoebe returned, armed with a stout verbal cricket bat, with which she proceeded to offer her compliments to the cadaverous visage of Mr Bennett.
When he regained consciousness, he bit back:
I wrote: "Then in December 2007, he caused further confusion by 'switching sides' as it were, and agreeing to work for Metodo 3, Brian Kennedy, Kevin Halligen, Henri Exton and the McCanns".Oh get on with it, Deathly Hallows
@ Phoebe replied: "There is absolutely no evidence of Smith 'changing sides'...Had Martin Smith refused to cooperate ...he would have found himself in a very awkward position..."
Solemn statement? Grow the fuck up, man. He made a statement. A sworn statement. Stop playing to your gallery of simpletons
REPLY: On 20 September 2007, Martin Smith made this solemn statement to an Irish police officer: "I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard [Gerald] McCann that I met that night carrying a child".
He was not ''working for them"
Phoebe, can you give me one really good, convincing, wholly persuasive argument as to why, barely three months later, Martin Smith was working for the McCann Team, talking to their investigation co-ordinator, Brian Kennedy, talking to Metodo 3 who were working for them, talking to Oakley International, Kevin Halligen and Henri Exton who were all also employed by the McCanns?
As you well know, being a struck off trainee solicitor, it is quite normal for either side in a potential civil or criminal action to gather witness testimony
Probably just being helpful, something completely foreign to you
What was his reason?
Shouldn't think so
Was he frightened of them?
Such as?
Did they have something on him?
Oh give over with the libelous bollocks, you gigantic arse wart.
Or had he originally been working for the Murat camp and against the McCanns?
Then when Brian Kennedy and Edward Smethurst had their famous summit meeting at the Eveleighs in Portugal on 13 November 2007, and 'talked turkey' with the Murat camp, did the two sides then kiss and make up? And then did they ask Martin Smith to sow further confusion?So are you answering the question, Baldylocks, or merely posing a load of unanswerable hypothetical bollocks?
Probably your sock accounts, in that case. Having other fuckwits on board is not a matter for pride.
It's a possibility already raised on the forum by 'Rogue-a-Tory' and 'Copodenieve'
At this point, Phoebe returned and set about him again, so he skulked off to bed, leaving matters in the less than capable hands of Verdi, the forum Cuntosaurus, who was about as much use as a one-legged man at an arse-kicking party, and hilariously posed the following question of Phoebe:
Which Phoebe later dealt with as follows:
I could repeat that exact sentence re those who say the Smiths are complicit in the cover-up!!Touché, indeed!
In the meantime there was a couple of sensible contributions from 'Polyenne' and 'lemonbutter' who both took Bennett to task, which is good to see in a forum which is generally only stocked with unflushable turds
In an amusing intervention, Mrs JH herself popped up to resurrect some old piece of Bennett stalking crap from 2014, apropos of absolutely nothing, before they all departed for oranges or whatever they consume at half-time.
What I find interesting is that Baldylocks has received very little support on this occasion, other than his usual spares, the unholy triumvirate of Jill Havern, Aquilla and the repulsive Verdi.
Pretty much everyone else has taken chunks out of him. No doubt they will shortly be joining the pile of members discarded for ''disrupting the forum''
Watch this space.....
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please ensure you write your posts in BLUE INK ONLY.
All posts should be divided into numbered bullet points, so I can pretend to be a solicitor again.