FOI Fest

Yet again, Baldylocks is poking his nose in where it isn't required. This time, it is the emergence of Dr Totman as the man seen by Tanner which has offended his fragile sensibilities
As it's him, his words appear in blue 😀

Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),

Oh shit, not him again 

In view of the claim by Dr Julian Totman, who in 2007 was working at the government's biological, chemical and nuclear weapons research establishment at Porton Down, Wiltshire,

Does Baldylocks actually KNOW this? The GP practice has a branch surgery at Porton, but that is not relevant; that would be like saying that someone with a business in London was connected to the Queen. I haven't seen anything stating that he was employed at the facility named, but even if it was, how is it relevant?  

that HE and NOT the man identified by DCI Redwood on BBC CrimeWatch in 2013 was the man allegedly seen by Jane Tanner at 9.15pm the night Madeleine McCann was reported missing,

Er - where has this been claimed? Redwood did not identify the man to whom they had spoken and I see no reason to suggest that he isn't Dr Totman 

it becomes still more important that the Met Police gives the public open, transparent and FULL answers to all reasonable questions about alleged abductors and suspects.

The police don't have to discuss ongoing investigations with nosy interfering tinfoil hat merchants and nor should they.

I have one more question please. Does Operation Grange now 
agree that Dr Julian Totman was the man seen by Jane Tenner?

Redwood already answered this. Why have you got it into your shiny head that he is a different man to the one Redwood pictured?