Making it up

Tony had to admit that Jill had some great ideas

Afternoon all.

Today I thought I'd take a look at the steaming pile of ordure that is Bonkers Bennett's letter to the Portuguese AG.

In order to do so I am going to delete about 95% of it and restrict it to the basic claims, because there is literally nothing to be achieved by going into the detail, other than giving my carpel tunnels a thorough workout

So here we go

(For those of you unfamiliar with how I work, my comments are in red)

From: The Madeleine McCann Research Group

No such thing 

(Address redacted) 

But it’s somewhere in Shropshire                                                                                                        

28 February 2018      

To: 

Exma Sra. Procuradora-Geral da República,

Drª Joana Marques Vidal

Dear Drª Joana Marques Vidal

re: The Disappearance of Madeleine McCann: New evidence of what happened to her

BIG LIE ALERT – there is no new evidence 

We are a group of mainly British researchers. Most of us have studied the disappearance of Madeleine McCann in depth for the past 10 years.

You are not researchers. You are not investigators. You are members of a web forum that thinks it’s the FBI 

Our members and researchers include many people with professional expertise, such as ex-police officers, lawyers, photographers, computer experts and statement analysts.

You have a former police officer, a former trainee solicitor who was struck off, you wouldn’t know a computer expert if they sauntered up and kicked you in the nuts and ‘statement analysis’ is entirely unproven

(Tavares de Almeida’s report  was here - deleted all this bit. No idea why he has bothered telling them what their own people wrote) 

The research that we have undertaken – and that of many others both here, in Portugal, and elsewhere – leads us to support all of the above conclusions in Tavares de Almeida’s report – except for one.

For ‘’research’’ read arguing the toss on the CMOMM and banning anyone who disagreed 

We noted that when the report of the Policia Judiciara was archived in July 2007, it was said that the case would be re-opened if ‘new and credible evidence’ was received by the Portuguese authorities.  The case was re-opened in the PJ’s Oporto office in 2013. Our letter contains evidence which we believe they should see and act on. 

No it doesn’t. Seriously, it doesn’t. No evidence has been presented at all, just a load of fuckwittery where the conclusions should be

As a result of painstaking research by many people, we believe that we are now in a position to supply you with new and credible evidence on one matter (the date of death) covered in the first point of Tavares de Almeida’s report, namely: “Conclusion  A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007”.

Yeah, you said that already and it was bollocks. Saying it again just makes it repetitive bollocks

We are satisfied that we can now provide sufficient evidence to show that the minor Madeleine McCann died not on the night of Thursday 3rd May, but instead died between Sunday afternoon (29th April) and Monday afternoon (30th April).

You can’t.

The remainder of this letter sets out in brief summary the evidence which we suggest points clearly to Madeleine having died on the Sunday or Monday that week.

You wouldn’t know a ‘’brief summary’’ if it shat on your cornflakes 

We will present the evidence under these seven headings: 

There now follows a list of eight headings, so the dozy wankpuffin can’t count either.

Anyway, I am going to comment on the headings and delete the rest

A  A large number of false statements were made at the outset, containing a huge amount of fabricated evidence. These added credibility to the McCanns’ claim that Madeleine had been abducted on Thursday 3 May. They diverted the PJ investigation into believing that Madeleine was still alive that day.

This is not evidence, it is opinion. What’s more it is the opinion of people who have clearly stopped taking their tablets. Bennett has not produced any evidence to support these sweeping claims

B  The photograph of Madeleine McCann, Dr Gerry McCann and Amelie, taken by the Ocean Club pool.

There is nowt wrong with the photo. Bennett uses weather data taken from a weather station 50 miles away as the basis for his bonkers claims. Bullshit about Flickr is just that - bullshit

C  The absence of photographs of Madeleine taken after Sunday. (7)

Utter bullshit. There are oodles of photos of her taken after Sunday, including photos taken by other people with Madeleine in the background. In fact, that alone blows all the rest of this bullshit document out of the water

D  The fabricated statement of Nuno Lourenco, who tried to identify Wojchiech Krokowski as a potential child-kidnapper who had tried to abduct his daughter on Sagres beach. (3) (8) (9) (10) (11)

More opinion portrayed as evidence. There is nothing whatsoever to indicate this was fabricated

E  The unreliable evidence of the children’s nanny (and McCann family friend), Catriona Baker, Dr Gerry McCann and Dr Kate McCann about an alleged ‘high tea’ at the Ocean Club Tapas restaurant, at about 5pm to 6pm on Thursday 3 May. (12)

More opinion, totally contradicted by the evidence contained within numerous eyewitness testimonies

F The lack of any credible, independent evidence by anybody that Madeleine McCann was seen alive after Sunday 29th April.  (7) (13)

Total cobblers. Really not worthy of anything more than that. There is ample evidence – eyewitnesses, documented records and photographic evidence

G  The mystery of the strange ‘Make-Up Photo’ of Madeleine, which appears to have been taken on Sunday 29th April, (5) (14) (15) and

There is no mystery and there is no indication it was taken on that date

H  Clear photographic evidence that the very same pyjamas Madeleine had with her on holiday in Praia da Luz were later held up by the McCanns at two press conferences, one in London on 5th June 2007, the other in Amsterdam, Holland, on 7th June 2007. (16) (17)

There is no such evidence. It was clearly stated that they were her sister’s pyjamas and that Madeleine’s were very similar and a little larger

Okay – so those are your eight headings. And all he has presented so far is a plate of double wank with shit chips.

I have deleted all the crap which followed which is basically a summary of ten years of Baldylocks posts. I could go through each individual point and debunk it but I’ve done that many times before so that can be found elsewhere

The facts point to death on Sunday, or Monday at the latest.

No they don’t. You have not presented any facts, just hypotheses.

This, we suggest, opens up a vital new line of enquiry.

It doesn’t 

This, we suggest, must be the starting-point for a fresh Portuguese police investigation.

And they will probably suggest you fuck off

We add many references below and would be willing to assist the Portuguese judicial and police authorities in any further way that we can.   

Yeah – just a suggestion, guys. Don’t quote tabloid reports and fuckwits like Textusa as your sources. It just makes you look like even bigger dicks

Yours sincerely

(Redacted)

But clearly Baldylocks 

For the Madeleine McCann Research Group

No such thing

Footnote 

Just a little addition for you

The letter included what was presumably intended to be an impressive list of references.

However, the devil is in the detail

Source	Total
Petermac book	3
Blogs	5
Richard Hall films	4
PJ files	6
CMOMM	20
Textusa	1
HiDeHo	1
Amaral’s book Newspapers Crimewatch Article by Bennett Clarence Mitchell interview Total	1 3 1 1 1 47

Most of it is simply posts from CMOMM, written by numbnuts